![]() '/home/silviu/.cxoffice/Another_test/dosdevices/./drive_c/Paradox_-_IP_Exploring_Tools_V164.exe'įixme:exec:SHELL_execute flags ignored: 0x00000100 I ran the program and tried to see what a log would point out and. ![]() Which is understandable since a defrag operation is very write intensive, and intensive writes are the killer of SSDs.Ah. Unfortunately Windows doesn't like to do that kind of defragment any more if it thinks that it's running on an SSD. That process typically performs a defragment operation in the VM to consolidate empty space at the "end" of the disk, then Fusion can cut back the size of the files that make up the virtual disk. ![]() Unused space is only released back to macOS when a "shrink" operation is performed in the VM. Instead, Fusion keeps the space allocated so that it doesn't have to go and find new disk space should the VM decide to re-use that empty space. But the host (Mac) is not told to release that space. When the files that are updated in the VM are deleted, the space is considered reusable in the VM as it would be on a physical disk. Added files would be increasing the size of the slices/chunks of the virtual disk file. Fusion doesn't release disk space back to the Mac as you add and delete files in the virtual machine (which would be happening when you perform an update). However, if you are looking at the virtual machine's virtual disk usage from the Mac side, that's a different story. ![]() The update process doesn't know that you're running it on a virtual machine. If your C drive has gone from 18 to 27 GB of usage, then Windows is responsible for that. If you are looking at what Windows is reporting within the virtual machine, there should be nothing special in disk space usage as reported by Windows with a VM compared to a physical machine. ![]() You need to be a little more specific about where you're measuring disk space from. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |